But we shouldn’t judge Michael because of this one hit. This kid gets straight As in school, works around the community and cares about a lot of people. When he injured a kid a different time the team (Erie Otters) looked all over the arena and could not find him. It turned out that he had paid a taxi to take him to the hospital so he could apologize to the other player.
I think that the way the OHL punished Michael is unfair. A whole year! Why? If Ben didn’t get hurt as bad as he did, then Michael wouldn’t be suspended for as long. It is based on the injury the person got instead of what the person did. I think that one of the best ways of deciding the suspension would be to match the suspension with the length of time missed by the length of the injury. I think that this is the fairest way to decide this because if you injured someone then you should be out as long as they are. But if the leagues cannot decide on this rule, then they should not look at how hurt the injured player is, they should look at the player that made the injury occur.
In summary, I think that first, Ben should have been more prepared, second, Michael should not be judged just based on this play, and finally, why did they have to suspend him for this long.
Now I’m going to ask you a few questions (if you have not already seen this hit that you should type in ‘Ben Fanelli hit’ on YouTube). Whose fault do you think it is? Do you think Michael should be punished this way? What honestly do you think was going through both of their heads before this hit happened? Thanks, Wyatt.